it was the fight of moral and immoral. now SC decision  has decided the character, moral. it is not not the social but also the religious, moral and humanity. we humble respect to the SC who delivered the decision. how such acts are done of such persons. it is un natural act. it is not permitted by those ,who are advocating this act.

now in our society some people will realize that it is an offense and not to propagate.I may ask to the followers that they can permit for this act to THEIR MOTHERS, SISTERS, DAUGHTERS, WIVES. AND ALSO THEIR FATHERS, BROTHERS, SONS AND RELATIVES.

      when it was treated as in human act.do not treat as religious, treat as moral. we have liberty but not want AT LIBERTY. ARGUMENTS ARE ENDLESS. BAD IS BAD , AND NONE ARE ACCEPTING. those are following FEEL GUILTY CONSCIOUS.in our society these are not honored /respected any where and even own self. i am unable to understand how they are interested in this act. this act comes under the category of sexual perversion. when you do not like to apply this act on your family members so why you are advocating such un natural act.it is not an ideal act.
    ONE religious leader said that if you the desire of sex so you can do with who so
 ever  may be your nearest and dearest, is is applicable. you have courage to do sex with own female members of the family or your relatives.
     i am unable to understand the views of oppose-rs, why they are wasting time, money,energy and food in wrong and futile direction. once it is wrong, bad, un natural and unacceptable so accept. it is genuine or not. how they are feeling and what are the experiences of post acts . i can understand that they feel unhappy and sinful mind. after doing intercourse with own wife after that we realize that we have wasted. it is a very transitory moment. so lust, sex must be regulated by religion, ethics, moral. it is not the personal freedom, after that they are known as addictive s, diseased so respect the decision of SC .

Advertisements